08-19-2020, 01:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-19-2020, 01:34 PM by Pig_Popper.)
NOT MY VIDEO :
At minute mark 6:17 the guy bore scopes the area I am getting interference at on my barrel.
I don’t see anything obvious on his bore scope to explain the spaced concentric rings on my bullets...
The barrel will go back when I have another in hand to replace it - I can be load developing with my 90 grain bullets with this barrel (checking velocities and powders out) with no detrimental effects.
I absolutely agree, the “heavy players” in the industry shouldn’t be experiencing these problems on a product launch.
Very disappointing !
One point I would like to discuss - I found the following article that talks about the importance of freebore dimensions - it is from this line of thought that I just don’t prefer to mess with a chamber that has been set by the initial reamer and polishing - metal can never go back ... would rather have a unit that was done right the first time.
Keep in mind , the issue appears to be with the shape of 1 bullet tested thus far , modifying a currently chambered barrel (that may not be to spec) and is for a bullet that I don’t plan to shoot seems like the same as saying two negatives make a positive in math , it just doesn’t add up for me.
At minute mark 6:17 the guy bore scopes the area I am getting interference at on my barrel.
I don’t see anything obvious on his bore scope to explain the spaced concentric rings on my bullets...
The barrel will go back when I have another in hand to replace it - I can be load developing with my 90 grain bullets with this barrel (checking velocities and powders out) with no detrimental effects.
I absolutely agree, the “heavy players” in the industry shouldn’t be experiencing these problems on a product launch.
Very disappointing !
One point I would like to discuss - I found the following article that talks about the importance of freebore dimensions - it is from this line of thought that I just don’t prefer to mess with a chamber that has been set by the initial reamer and polishing - metal can never go back ... would rather have a unit that was done right the first time.
Keep in mind , the issue appears to be with the shape of 1 bullet tested thus far , modifying a currently chambered barrel (that may not be to spec) and is for a bullet that I don’t plan to shoot seems like the same as saying two negatives make a positive in math , it just doesn’t add up for me.