VV 135
#2
I have never used it, it looks to be between H4895 and accurate 2520 on burn rate. And with Hornady’s published load data it’s going to do as good as anything they have listed except for maybe cfe223 and Leverevolution. I say go for it, the more people testing various powders the faster we will be able to weed out the ones that don’t work for the ARC. Just go slow and be observant.
Trashy
Reply


Messages In This Thread
VV 135 - by mikebin - 08-23-2020, 08:52 PM
RE: VV 135 - by Trashy - 08-24-2020, 12:41 AM
RE: VV 135 - by mikebin - 08-24-2020, 01:28 AM
RE: VV 135 - by Trashy - 08-24-2020, 02:09 AM
RE: VV 135 - by VASCAR2 - 08-26-2020, 05:50 PM
RE: VV 135 - by mikebin - 08-31-2020, 11:40 PM
RE: VV 135 - by mikebin - 09-02-2020, 07:22 PM
RE: VV 135 - by Trashy - 09-02-2020, 11:38 PM
RE: VV 135 - by mikebin - 09-03-2020, 12:09 AM
RE: VV 135 - by Trashy - 09-04-2020, 02:39 AM
RE: VV 135 - by mikebin - 09-04-2020, 11:59 AM
RE: VV 135 - by Trashy - 09-05-2020, 08:31 PM
RE: VV 135 - by mikebin - 09-06-2020, 12:47 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)