07-29-2020, 08:46 PM
I've reviewed Hodgdon's load data for same bullets and powder for 6mmPPC and 6BR Remington and their data almost raises more questions than it answers.
Figured I'd go about 1 grain heavier than 6PPC data and about 1 grain lighter than 6BR data to get 6mmARC starting points.
However, Hodgdon's data seems off in some cases.
For example, the 6mm 107gr SMK from 6PPC with 28.5 CFE at 48,600 CUP nets 2,702 fps.
Same bullet from 6BR with 30.0 CFE at 49,000 CUP nets 2,632 fps.
More powder. More pressure. Same bullet. Same 24" barrel length. Less velocity?
Doesn't compute.
I suppose one test barrel could be "fast" and the other "slow." That's a plausible explanation, but doesn't really help us rely on the data.
Anyway, screen grabs of Hodgdon data are attached for your convenience.
Thoughts?
Figured I'd go about 1 grain heavier than 6PPC data and about 1 grain lighter than 6BR data to get 6mmARC starting points.
However, Hodgdon's data seems off in some cases.
For example, the 6mm 107gr SMK from 6PPC with 28.5 CFE at 48,600 CUP nets 2,702 fps.
Same bullet from 6BR with 30.0 CFE at 49,000 CUP nets 2,632 fps.
More powder. More pressure. Same bullet. Same 24" barrel length. Less velocity?
Doesn't compute.
I suppose one test barrel could be "fast" and the other "slow." That's a plausible explanation, but doesn't really help us rely on the data.
Anyway, screen grabs of Hodgdon data are attached for your convenience.
Thoughts?
:: 6mmARC Target Cartridge with Hunting Capability :: 6.5 GRENDEL Hunting Cartridge with Target Capability ::
:: I Drank the Water :: Revelation 21:6 ::